What Boombox Are You Cranking Up Right Now??

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Fired up the JVC M71 today. Perfect companion for yard work. I try to cycle through all my boomboxes on a regular basis. My M70's haven't been used in a while. It's easy to forget how good these sound and how powerful they are. It's no accident why they are so popular.

20190629_134141_HDR~2.jpg
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Jamming the Sanyo 9994K today. This one has been on the shelf for 6 months collecting dust. It's one of my favorite medium sized boomboxes. It's sound signature is tuned perfectly for jazz and heavy instrumental and vocal tracks. I don't know if any other boombox makes vocals and instruments sound as sweet.
20190630_114930_HDR~2.jpg
 

Fatdog

Well-Known Member
Staff member
mellymelsr said:
Jamming the Sanyo 9994K today. This one has been on the shelf for 6 months collecting dust. It's one of my favorite medium sized boomboxes. It's sound signature is tuned perfectly for jazz and heavy instrumental and vocal tracks. I don't know if any other boombox makes vocals and instruments sound as sweet.
attachicon.gif
20190630_114930_HDR~2.jpg
You know, I never found myself wanting a 9994K, but here lately it is really starting to grow on me. I might have to start looking for one. :yes:
 

Reli

Boomus Fidelis
Fatdog said:
Jamming the Sanyo 9994K today. This one has been on the shelf for 6 months collecting dust. It's one of my favorite medium sized boomboxes. It's sound signature is tuned perfectly for jazz and heavy instrumental and vocal tracks. I don't know if any other boombox makes vocals and instruments sound as sweet.
attachicon.gif
20190630_114930_HDR~2.jpg
You know, I never found myself wanting a 9994K, but here lately it is really starting to grow on me. I might have to start looking for one. :yes:
Best build quality of any Sanyo, and better than even the M70 IMO....
The only thing an M70 has over the M9994 is its sheer loudness
 

PostEnder

Member (SA)
That Aiwa CS-600 you had there looks good, ahardb0dy. I’ve got one, too. Is that one the “-U” version? That’s the same version I have, including its two shortwave (SW) bands. (I shrug to say I’ve often said it’s a pity that brands like Aiwa, Hitachi and Sony too often excluded fine-tuning controls from their shortwave-tuning models in the ‘80s.)

That Stereo 600 doesn’t have any scarring on either of the circular speaker grilles. So that makes its front prettier than mine. Mine’s got a significant scar on one of the grilles. (Uh, is it the left one?)

What 104.1 MHz FM station is it that one hears early in your four minutes-odd YouTube clip? My count on Wikipedia shows there are over 110 radio stations broadcasting on 104.1 MHz in the United States alone. (Even though a lot of them are “Low Power” [LP] broadcasters.)

Is that 104.1 beaming from Buffalo, New York? (That’s WHTT-FM.) Or Chenango Bridge? (That’s WWYL, in the Binghamton area.) Another state in the U.S.? Maybe KFIS “The Fish™,” Scappoose, Oregon?

On tape, I also heard a familiar radio name from back in the day: Kool DJ Red Alert. (Yes, it’s “Kool” with a “K.”) He was a fixture on the FM broadcast scene in the ‘90s in the New York City area. Wikipedia info’ via a Google search shows that his shows now beam from WBLS (107.5 MHz; a Northeast station, too, I almost forgot LOL) When was the programme recorded?

That cassette in the video has orange anti erasure tabs. What’s it? A Maxell? A TDK? (Can’t seem to Google any images of it.)

Who was that ‘80s female rapper we hear around the 1:57 mark? Is that Roxanne Shante? (I listened to her mid-Eighties “Bite This” classic on YouTube before finishing this message.)

Well, anyway, that Stereo 600 has a better-behaved cassette-deck mechanism than that of my Stereo 600. Thanks to a partial repair, the mechanism is misguided enough to fast-forward just about every time that one hits the REWIND key. (Shaking this head of mine) The repairer, a gentleman with a lot of experience in electronics repair, did warn me by e-mail that he couldn’t fully fix the darn device. (Something about a messed-up cam gear and trip pawl.) Ah, well, thanks for sharing.
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Fatdog said:
Jamming the Sanyo 9994K today. This one has been on the shelf for 6 months collecting dust. It's one of my favorite medium sized boomboxes. It's sound signature is tuned perfectly for jazz and heavy instrumental and vocal tracks. I don't know if any other boombox makes vocals and instruments sound as sweet.
attachicon.gif
20190630_114930_HDR~2.jpg
You know, I never found myself wanting a 9994K, but here lately it is really starting to grow on me. I might have to start looking for one. :yes:
As I get older my ears appreciate the subtleties in the background of a song. The 9994 does it so smoothly...a great box for indoor listening sessions.
 

PostEnder

Member (SA)
At least that Sanyo M-9994K has two shortwave (SW) bands, for internationalized radio listening. (It's got a nesting fine-tuning knob, yes?) And those VU meters always stir the "vintage appreciator" in one. Our man Reli kind of upset me in implying that the M-9994K outdoes even the stylish, "end of the Seventies" M-9998K, if only in sheer structural ruggedness. (But no real offense, Reli. Just a pout on my part. Though I have to say that, from its recessed cylinder of a top-mounted POWER key to its tilting, squared cassette holder brackets, the '9998 was a marvel.)

Digressions aside, mellymelsr, thanks for sharing the view. Enjoy something smooth with it. (Maybe some George Benson, atypical though his wife's name is ...)
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
[QUOTE="]At least that Sanyo M-9994K has two shortwave (SW) bands, for internationalized radio listening. (It's got a nesting fine-tuning knob, yes?) And those VU meters always stir the "vintage appreciator" in one. Our man Reli kind of upset me in implying that the M-9994K outdoes even the stylish, "end of the Seventies" M-9998K, if only in sheer structural ruggedness. (But no real offense, Reli. Just a pout on my part. Though I have to say that, from it recessed cylinder of a top-mounted POWER key to its tilting, squared cassette holder brackets, the '9998 was a marvel.)

Digressions aside, mellymelsr, thanks for sharing the view. Enjoy something smooth with it. (Maybe some George Benson, atypical though his wife's name is ...)
[/QUOTE]Thank you sir...and I will definitely add George Benson to the playlist.

The Panasonic 5500. Built more like professional sound equipment than a boombox. Very heavy for it's size. High quality switches and components. This one really shines with high quality audio playing through it. Smooth and clean sound. Got very lucky with this "in the wild" find. It is in 9.5 condition and fully functional. Found it on the LetGo app locally for a measly $60.

20190702_094443~2.jpg
 

Reli

Boomus Fidelis
^ That is the heaviest box of its size.


Here we have a GF-515. I had always been hesitant about these, due to their odd, non-macho appearance. But when you lay your hands on one, you'll understand the appeal. True, it doesn't have a "street" look, but it DOES have a very "retro/vintage" look, with its tweeter horns, microphone grills, fake coaxial tweeters, and real metal tape doors. I was hesitant about the beige-colored tape keys, but now I think they perfectly complement the champagne color of the rest of the box. Black keys wouldn't have looked good on this box. Chrome keys would have been nice, but it's not a big deal.

More importantly, this model has extreme build quality, with very heavy tape decks mounted to a very sturdy 3-part chassis. The keys are a joy to use. No flex at all when pushing them down, because of the rigid inner chassis they're mounted to. Sharp was marketing this to people who wanted to do some really good quality dubbing. The wow & flutter is only 0.06%, which is very stable, and is bested by only a handful of boxes like the Aiwa CS-660, 770, and 880, whose wow & flutter is only 0.038%. But those are more modern, full-logic decks. For this Sharp's simple mechanical deck to get anywhere close to that is quite an achievement. Consider that the vast majority of boomboxes are somewhere between 0.15% (fair) to 0.3% (horrible).

A couple of unusual features: The Eject keys are separate from Stop keys. Sharp didn't cheap out and combine those keys like most boomboxes do. Also, the Stop keys are locked unless the tape deck is actually running. Also, the woofers are not mounted directly behind the chrome trim rings. They're offset inwards a bit. Perhaps something inside, like circuit boards or screw posts, prevented Sharp from mounting the speakers more outward. I suppose I could paint the speaker cones black to hide that fact. But again, it's not a big deal.

These models are a bit bass-shy, and require a phone or MP3 player with EQ settings to maximize their potential. But the sound is clean and accurate, not muddy like some boxes.


do192f.jpg
 

Attachments

  • WP_20190608_15_59_31_Pro.jpg
    WP_20190608_15_59_31_Pro.jpg
    136 KB · Views: 9
  • WP_20190608_16_00_36_Pro.jpg
    WP_20190608_16_00_36_Pro.jpg
    158.4 KB · Views: 10

Fatdog

Well-Known Member
Staff member
The GF-515 definitely looks better than the GF-555 or the GF-666. The perforated metal grille makes all the difference.
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Decided to give the Crown 850 some sun. Not intended for the US with it's 220V power requirement I am lucky to have this one. It's sound leans toward deep bass and clean highs. It handles all music genres very well. This one also has a set of custom made aluminium switches...

20190703_102620_HDR~2.jpg
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Reli said:
^ That is the heaviest box of its size.


Here we have a GF-515. I had always been hesitant about these, due to their odd, non-macho appearance. But when you lay your hands on one, you'll understand the appeal. True, it doesn't have a "street" look, but it
DOES have a very "retro/vintage" look,​
with its tweeter horns, microphone grills, fake coaxial tweeters, and real metal tape doors. I was hesitant about the beige-colored tape keys, but now I think they perfectly complement the champagne color of the rest of the box. Black keys wouldn't have looked good on this box. Chrome keys would have been nice, but it's not a big deal.

More importantly, this model has extreme build quality, with very heavy tape decks mounted to a very sturdy 3-part chassis. The keys​
are a joy to use. No flex at all when pushing them down, because of the rigid inner chassis they're mounted to. Sharp was marketing this to people who wanted to do some really good quality dubbing. The wow & flutter is only 0.06%, which is very stable, and is bested by only a handful of boxes like the Aiwa CS-660, 770, and 880, whose wow & flutter is only 0.038%. But those are more modern, full-logic decks. For this Sharp's simple mechanical deck to get anywhere close to that is quite an achievement. Consider that the vast majority of boomboxes are somewhere between 0.15% (fair) to 0.3% (horrible).

A couple of unusual features: The Eject keys are separate from Stop keys. Sharp didn't cheap out and combine those keys like most boomboxes do. Also, the Stop keys are locked unless the tape deck is actually running. Also, the woofers are not mounted directly behind the chrome trim rings. They're offset inwards a bit. Perhaps something inside, like circuit boards or screw posts, prevented Sharp from mounting the speakers more outward. I suppose I could paint the speaker cones black to hide that fact. But again, it's not a big deal.

These models are a bit bass-shy, and require a phone or MP3 player with EQ settings to maximize their potential. But the sound is clean and accurate, not muddy like some boxes.


do192f.jpg
I actually like the looks of this one. Looks like a quality box.
 

mellymelsr

Member (SA)
Sanyo M-X920. Beautiful design. Top notch build quality. Great sound. Has that late 70's quality receiver feel to it. Weighted tuner knob and switches that snap into each notch. A majestic boombox.

20190703_231934~2.jpg