MasterBlaster84
Boomus Fidelis
I'll admit my preference leaned slightly to the 9998 on looks but I love them both and don't think you'd go wrong with good working examples of either one. 

Superduper said:Melly. In case you were wondering what the innards look like, here it is! It's NOT a beginner boombox to tinker with and not for the faint of heart. Look at how the amp module is tetheredIt looked simple outside of the boombox, didn't it?
![]()
monchito said:if you do not like the 920 let me know![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Superduper said:redbenjoe said:thats very surprising --![]()
so --the big news is --that a :super: capped box is the only way to go
norm --did you agree with melly re this comparo ?
Here ya go:
My (2) M-X920. Melly left the nicer/mintier one for you richer guys.
oh yes of causeSuperduper said:When you own 100 boomboxes, and you recap something that doesn't appear to need it, you might be wasting your money. BUT if you own 4 boomboxes, you should recap them all to improve reliability and restore like-new performance. OR if your boombox has symptoms that suggest weird operational or circuitry issues, it should be recapped.
ONE thing that is not clearly understood is that most amplifier stages are capacitor coupled. Capacitors will pass AC but block DC. I won't get into the technical aspects of how it works but suffice it to say that the capacitors protect the varying amplifier stages from DC signals which if not operating properly, could take out all the stages of an amplifier when one stage fails. Therefore, if a capacitor fails open, then you are OK in that while the boombox might not work, the other stages should remain intact. If a cap fails short and another amplifier stage fails, it could create an avalanche effect and take out everything.