JVC m90 vs Victor m90

Tinman

Member (SA)
You aren't lying brother. The rolling stones wrote a song about it. :-)

But, I enjoy us seasoned boomboxery members. We can lean on one another, and there is something to be said for that :-)

We lived the best years of this world IMO. Our existing working radios are the icon of an era.
Not sure if you clicked on my quote but it's a link.
I can't get the song out of my head.
It'll be in there for at least a few days :lol:
Growing up in the 80s was pretty great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transistorized

Ghettoboom767

Member (SA)
This is a great reminder of these ratings and outputs and again this has all been 'put to bed' it's all fairly simple.Different aging electronics and how they were kept and treated and used over the years gives us all different results.
Great job Norm for your experience and electronics genius!!!
I just need to someday restore my M-90.
Have new grills and eject button to put in and needs deck fixed.
 

aiwapanasonic

Member (SA)
I've got some more stats on the different models; I would assume correct unless someone has played around swapping parts with the machines I got hold of; unlikely but just to keep that in mind as a possibility.

My observations:
  • The two non-JDM models are both rated at 70W with seemingly identical AC to DC power transformers. However, the speakers are differently signed models- one has the 20W speakers, the other the 25W speakers (I'm not saying the speakers are indeed different because it's been discussed elsewhere that they are most likely identical, regardless of the W and model number written on them)
  • the JDM Victor has a higher DC output coming from the power transformer at 20.5v but this could be due to the fact that my AC voltage for two JVCs is set to 240v at the switch; but the mains only has 230v currently. The LD/W models have both 19v DC at the power plug
  • Now I get that mod by the guy who used 12 batteries instead of 10; it brings the battery DC output to the same level as what's coming out of the AC/DC transformer inside; still, I'm not sure if it's safe to do this because the two power circuits may still be different so I wouldn't do this myself
  • The BIGGEST difference: the Volume pot is marked differently on the Victor vs the JVCs. The halfway up mark is at 5.5 on the victor vs 5 on the JVC. So if you want to set both at 4, it means the JVC machine is about 5-7% higher on the volume pot. It makes quite bit of a difference. I wonder if we got caught by this during the listening tests

JVC RC M90 LD:
- DIN for Rec/Playback.
- 70 W written on the back
- woofers: JVC HSA2005-01J , 25W written on them.
- DC in: 15v written on the back
- AC 240/220/110v
- voltage measured at the power plug after the power transformer: 19v (AC switch set to 240v; power in the mains: 230v)

JVC RC M90 W:
- Line in / out;
- 70 W written on the back
- woofers: JVC HSA2005-01G; 20W written on them
- DC in: 15v written on the back
- AC 240/220/110v
- voltage measured at the power plug after the power transformer: 19v (AC switch set to 240v; power in the mains: 230v)

Victor RC M90:
- Line in / out;
- 28W written on the back
- woofers: JVC HSA2005-01G; 20W written on them
- DC in: 15v written on the back
- AC 100v
- voltage measured at the power plug after the power transformer: 20.5v (this is a 100v only; power in the mains: 100v; using a step-down converter)
 
Last edited:

aiwapanasonic

Member (SA)
some photos
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6807.jpg
    IMG_6807.jpg
    210 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_6809.jpg
    IMG_6809.jpg
    141.3 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_6808.jpg
    IMG_6808.jpg
    149.7 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_6806.jpg
    IMG_6806.jpg
    216.6 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_6801.jpg
    IMG_6801.jpg
    77.9 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_6798.jpg
    IMG_6798.jpg
    148.6 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_6797.jpg
    IMG_6797.jpg
    191.9 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_6795.jpg
    IMG_6795.jpg
    152.5 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_6794.jpg
    IMG_6794.jpg
    166.3 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_6793.jpg
    IMG_6793.jpg
    172.2 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_6792.jpg
    IMG_6792.jpg
    163.2 KB · Views: 3