Quick sound comparison: TRK-8080W, M9990K, GF-9292X

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Guys & Gals,

I thought it would be fun to do a quick sound comparison video review of the following mid sized boxes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNhip5I2aO0&feature=youtu.be

1. Hitachi TRK-8080W
2. Sanyo M9990K
3. Sharp GF-9292X

All three of these units are of similar size and weight with the Sharp being slightly larger and heavier.
The Hitachi and Sanyo are 12V (8 D cell) units with the Sharp being a 15V (10 D cell) unit.
Being higher end models of their type, all three have separate bass and treble dials.

All three are good examples and to my knowledge, have healthy amps and sound as good or better when compared with other examples of these models.

Whilst some will say that they don't normally leave the bass and treble settings at the flat position for normal use, I wanted to do a 'factory settings' comparison of these three models.

Although the sound of the video can never completely offer a 100% accurate representation of the sound characteristics of each unit, it is pretty close to what I heard 'live' whilst filming each model. If you have good quality computer speakers and sub, you should get pretty close to the real thing.

3rd place: Hitachi TRK-8080W. The Hitachi in comparison to the others tested offered a hollow sound with quite a muted treble sound with a very modest amount of bass. The Hitachi is well suited to soft music although I do leave the loudness setting on and the bass & treble settings at max at all times.

2nd place: Sharp GF-9292W. I know many won't agree with this choice of runner-up but although the Sharp is easily the most powerful unit tested, the treble isn't quite as crisp and the bass never gets down to the depths offered by the winner. The Sharps' sound is very strong on mids. If I turn up the bass, I always have to set the treble to max to compensate. It's a great rock box and for outdoor applications where shear grunt is the order of the day, the GF-9292X is the way to go.

1st place: Sanyo appears to have tailored the sound of the M9990K to be biased toward bass from the get go. Even on the flat settings, the bass is strong with the highs are also well represented. So for general use including indoor low - medium volume levels, the Sanyo gets the nod from me this time around. ;-)

Have a great weekend,

James.... :-)
 

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
You hit the key with "music" selections and situational listening. These are all great boxes when you get down to it and I believe you hit the nail on the head in your descriptions. Engineering and design obviously have a lot to do with it. In regards to that Sanyo's always tended to have woofers with more free movement allowing for the deeper bass along with the way they designed their particular audio output. Sharps, GF-777, GX-300 and other powerhouses excepted, always have been great rock out boxes. Hitachi's are kind of all over the map but never really bass powerhouses (some component units excepted) as they seem to be the box that tries to find that middle ground. If all music were acoustical, the Hitachi would be the choice box.

Nice short take review of all three. :-D
 

Lasonic TRC-920

Moderator
Great review Jimmy.

These three radio's you picked out are also right around the same price range (if you find them in good working condition) These types of reviews are good for me, because when it comes to dropping actual money, I use these reviews to help in my selection. So far, Boomboxery has helped me find some great radios!

I have been eye-ball'en the M9990K on eBay and they bring in some decent money. I'm hoping to find one down the line.
 
Thanks guys.

I'm sure you'd be happy with an M9990 Chris. The problem is they're so scarce. They have the classic 70s look with quality old school switch gear etc but they have the bassy sound of an 80s box. It's also proven to be real easy on D cells too. ;-)

Now all I need is the big brother M9994K with twice the power!! :drool:

Can anyone do a sound comparison between an M9990 and an M9994?

James..... :-)
 

Lasonic TRC-920

Moderator
jimmyjimmy19702010 said:
Thanks guys.

I'm sure you'd be happy with an M9990 Chris. The problem is they're so scarce. They have the classic 70s look with quality old school switch gear etc but they have the bassy sound of an 80s box. It's also proven to be real easy on D cells too. ;-)

Now all I need is the big brother M9994K with twice the power!! :drool:

Can anyone do a sound comparison between an M9990 and an M9994?

James..... :-)
I too would like to see that comparison :thumbsup:
 

redbenjoe

I Am Legend
thanks alot james --great read/review

as for the 9990 vs the 9994 --
no contest --the 9994 is soooooooooooooo much more solid with much deeper//stronger bass
and terrific highs --to my ears - the 9994 sounds better than the m70 -
especially at low to mid volumes
 

Ghettoboom767

Member (SA)
I should do a 9990,9994,9998 comparison one of these days:) But like Ira said-the 9994 is much louder and more powerful,better highs and lows!:):)
 

baddboybill

Boomus Fidelis
Great comparison :thumbsup: I know when I had the Hitachi I noticed it had plenty of highs but really no lows. Seems like sharp and Hitachi both have this but Sanyo has a deeper bass sound as well as nice highs :-)
 

baddboybill

Boomus Fidelis
redbenjoe said:
thanks alot james --great read/review

as for the 9990 vs the 9994 --
no contest --the 9994 is soooooooooooooo much more solid with much deeper//stronger bass
and terrific highs --to my ears - the 9994 sounds better than the m70 -
especially at low to mid volumes
I've heard this as well but I've also heard, and I can't really compare anymore, that the 9994 has better sound than the 9998 :hmmm: what are your feelings Ira?
 
baddboybill said:
Great comparison :thumbsup: I know when I had the Hitachi I noticed it had plenty of highs but really no lows. Seems like sharp and Hitachi both have this but Sanyo has a deeper bass sound as well as nice highs :-)
What keeps the Hitachi in my collection Bill is the fact that it's still my favorite Box for looks, ergonomics, switch gear and a fantastic line in. The funny thing is, if I change the equalizer setting on the IPhone to the 'Rock' setting, the Hitachi's bass is actually better than the GF-9292 so the speakers can kick bass if they get the right signals!!

James....
 

baddboybill

Boomus Fidelis
jimmyjimmy19702010 said:
Great comparison :thumbsup: I know when I had the Hitachi I noticed it had plenty of highs but really no lows. Seems like sharp and Hitachi both have this but Sanyo has a deeper bass sound as well as nice highs :-)
What keeps the Hitachi in my collection Bill is the fact that it's still my favorite Box for looks, ergonomics, switch gear and a fantastic line in. The funny thing is, if I change the equalizer setting on the IPhone to the 'Rock' setting, the Hitachi's bass is actually better than the GF-9292 so the speakers can kick bass if they get the right signals!!


James....
She is a beauty and I miss it :-(
 
While my 9998K was working, I remember the sound was nice but I didn't really get that low frequency bass that I got on the M9990!? I guess it really depends on the health of each box. By the way, the 9998K build quality feels more solid than the 9994K I had. I just love the super smooth tape door action of the 9998K.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.