This is my Hitachi TRK-8130E:
View attachment 21297
.....and below
is a...........................
Roberts RSR 100!:
.
View attachment 21296
http://www.shizaudio.ru/audio/./data/media/18/Roberts_RSR_100.jpg
Seems to me that a quick revamp of the 8130E's speaker areas & tuning display with a partial change of colour can breath new life into the model - NOT! Personally speaking, I think the Roberts version is a mess and proof that a decent BB can't be rebadged with a few not-so-subtle changes and be a runaway success. There are other images online to show that the Roberts version is from the same fabrication mould as the Hitachi.
Any thoughts on this and are there any other known examples of a disasterous mistake by a (wannabe) brand trying to ride on the back of another brand's success (or not)? Maybe I have this wrong and the licence was sold or, perhaps, Hitachi is a parent company?
All I know is that I was horrified when I saw the Roberts version !
View attachment 21297
.....and below
is a...........................
Roberts RSR 100!:
.
View attachment 21296
http://www.shizaudio.ru/audio/./data/media/18/Roberts_RSR_100.jpg
Seems to me that a quick revamp of the 8130E's speaker areas & tuning display with a partial change of colour can breath new life into the model - NOT! Personally speaking, I think the Roberts version is a mess and proof that a decent BB can't be rebadged with a few not-so-subtle changes and be a runaway success. There are other images online to show that the Roberts version is from the same fabrication mould as the Hitachi.
Any thoughts on this and are there any other known examples of a disasterous mistake by a (wannabe) brand trying to ride on the back of another brand's success (or not)? Maybe I have this wrong and the licence was sold or, perhaps, Hitachi is a parent company?
All I know is that I was horrified when I saw the Roberts version !
