fh-7 vs pc550

Status
Not open for further replies.

bill

Member (SA)
so i have spent time today with these two fine boomboxes listening to them side by side.
my overall observation of the two is that they both were made pretty much as good as both respective company could make a boombox back in the day.

the pc550 really has a lot of power behind it i am thinking the big heavy transformer in it much helps it to have a very warm and detailed sound.
the tape player on it has dolby b and c and the cool flourescent display is just one of the coolest features on any boombox ever produced.
the fh7 tho is no slouch in terms of hitech looks. squared off apm speakers cool backlit digital tuner and led capped eq sliders.
both these units have detachable handles and panels that bolt onto the sides of the unit to hold the handles and speakers in place.
so listening to the radio i can say the tuner on the pc550 seems a little nicer in terms of sound. it does appear tho the sony gets better reception and is quite capable as a shortwave receiver i dont really know if this sony boom box uses dual conversion but i am suspecting it does.
the eq on the pc550 seems to do more in terms of attenuation or boosting of a particular band.
the sony works too but not so much boost .
flat the sony seems to have a nicer sound but with the eq tweaked i think the pc550 sounds really amazing.
i think tho the pc550 has more distortion in its sound than the fh7 but the way it distorts is kind of fantastic.
stereo separation seems to be nicer on the pc550 as well.
you can turn this box up very very loud and it will deliver clean sound with decent bass its hard to make this box honk on the lower end of the spectrum but it will at extremely high volumes.
the same goes for the fh7. i think the fh7 edges the pc550 in terms of bass .
i think the fh7 also has a cleaner sound.
does this mean i think its sounds better than the pc550.
i am not so sure about that i mean in fact i think it would be hard to pick between the two.
they both have there own character and both of them are really iconic in terms of stylish three piece exotic boomboxes.
both of them wiegh about the same.
both have mdf cabs for the speakers.
both have excellent tape decks. the sony seems to have better sliders switches and build quality overall.
this cannot be said for the later fh sonys i have.
while the big fh215rs are louder than both these boxes by quite a bit they are not put together as well.
theres a lot of metal on the pc550.
its a really nice looking box as most of you know.
so is the sony fh7.
i think everyone needs one of each of these in there collection.
even if you cant find the rechargeable battery pack for your fh7 its a really great sounding boombox and i think the mk3 is the best of the series of the fh7.
apm speakers and they are threeway speakers.
they both are winners in my book.
 

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
Which version of the FH-7 do you have? Is it the MKIII with the three way speakers?

I have a PC-55 and an FH-5 with the three way speakers. (The 5 & 7 are close enough to make their differences academeic.) I would say in a minute that while both have their merits, I give the nod to the Sony because of th soundstage the three way speakers provide as well as better punch from the APM speakers. :-)
 

Fatdog

Well-Known Member
Staff member
I agree with Bill regarding the build quality comparison. The slider controls on the PC-55 are its weakest link. As for the sound between the two, I might have to go with the PC-55 - at least using my own ears AND "IF" the FH-7 sounds pretty much the same as the FH-5. The FH-5 has a great soundstage as Frizzle pointed out. However, there seems to be a "warmness" in sound with the PC-55 that I just didn't get with the Sony. Maybe I need to hear Bill's FH-7. :yes:
 

bill

Member (SA)
oldskool69 said:
Which version of the FH-7 do you have? Is it the MKIII with the three way speakers?

I have a PC-55 and an FH-5 with the three way speakers. (The 5 & 7 are close enough to make their differences academeic.) I would say in a minute that while both have their merits, I give the nod to the Sony because of th soundstage the three way speakers provide as well as better punch from the APM speakers. :-)


i have the mk3

and you are right there is more punch from the fh7 in terms of bass. i also think the sony must have less harmonic distortion but.....
the way the pc550 sounds is extremely nice and wide there is a lot of separation in the stereo image and it sounds magical.
 

bill

Member (SA)
Fatdog said:
I agree with Bill regarding the build quality comparison. The slider controls on the PC-55 are its weakest link. As for the sound between the two, I might have to go with the PC-55 - at least using my own ears AND "IF" the FH-7 sounds pretty much the same as the FH-5. The FH-5 has a great soundstage as Frizzle pointed out. However, there seems to be a "warmness" in sound with the PC-55 that I just didn't get with the Sony. Maybe I need to hear Bill's FH-7. :yes:

i have the mk3 version of the fh7 and you know its a really really good box in fact i think it deserves to be called a grail.
the pc550 tho has something about the sound that the sony does not have but you can also say the same about the sony.

i have a feeling that big transformer in the pc550 is part of it. i almost want to say the pc550 sounds tubby and the sony sounds solid state. i think some people with some tube gear kicking around out there may understand what i am saying.
both are awesome.
 

bill

Member (SA)
:agree: trust me tim i have my eyes out for one of those. i have found two pc550 boxes during my collecting days.
i think i might come across a pc55 at some point.
:thumbsup:
 

floyd

Boomus Fidelis
one of these days i'm going to put some high roll foam surround on my pc 55's woofers ,i bet it will really wake it up in the bass department ,luckily i have 2 sets of speakers so i can compare the performance side by side ,the only problem is finding the new foams in the right size and with the high roll thick foam ,once i do then i bet this baby will thump harder than it does now,but don't get me wrong the pc 55 is no chump when it comes to sound.
 

Radio raheem

Requiem Æternam
JVC Floyd said:
one of these days i'm going to put some high roll foam surround on my pc 55's woofers ,i bet it will really wake it up in the bass department ,luckily i have 2 sets of speakers so i can compare the performance side by side ,the only problem is finding the new foams in the right size and with the high roll thick foam ,once i do then i bet this baby will thump harder than it does now,but don't get me wrong the pc 55 is no chump when it comes to sound.

I changed a set on one of my 55's floyd it sounds way better to my ears, if i remember right i posted a pick on stg calling it the pc 1000 :-D
 

floyd

Boomus Fidelis
Rimmer36 said:
JVC Floyd said:
one of these days i'm going to put some high roll foam surround on my pc 55's woofers ,i bet it will really wake it up in the bass department ,luckily i have 2 sets of speakers so i can compare the performance side by side ,the only problem is finding the new foams in the right size and with the high roll thick foam ,once i do then i bet this baby will thump harder than it does now,but don't get me wrong the pc 55 is no chump when it comes to sound.

I changed a set on one of my 55's floyd it sounds way better to my ears, if i remember right i posted a pick on stg calling it the pc 1000 :-D
thanks tim ,i been wanting to do this for a while now ,i like the looks of the original cones so i was not in a hurry to change those maybe just squeeze some better sound from the old ones.
 

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
JVC Floyd said:
Rimmer36 said:
JVC Floyd said:
one of these days i'm going to put some high roll foam surround on my pc 55's woofers ,i bet it will really wake it up in the bass department ,luckily i have 2 sets of speakers so i can compare the performance side by side ,the only problem is finding the new foams in the right size and with the high roll thick foam ,once i do then i bet this baby will thump harder than it does now,but don't get me wrong the pc 55 is no chump when it comes to sound.

I changed a set on one of my 55's floyd it sounds way better to my ears, if i remember right i posted a pick on stg calling it the pc 1000 :-D
thanks tim ,i been wanting to do this for a while now ,i like the looks of the original cones so i was not in a hurry to change those maybe just squeeze some better sound from the old ones.


See the linky for what I did...world of diference! :-D :yes:

http://stereo2go.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8306018954/m/1261042035?r=1261042035#1261042035
 
Status
Not open for further replies.