I'm in danger of compounding a cliché here but JVC really knew their game. I've heard my PC11 through a pair of PC55 speakers and it enjoyed itself as much as I did!
PC11 is only let down by thae stock speakers not having that overblown thumping that some people believe is how bass should sound (yeah, me included
![Blush :blush: :blush:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/boomboxery/blush.gif)
but sometimes
tuneful is better than
in yer face) but its deck is easily the better of most as it comes with Dolby B and C (SANRS was licensed to T. "Al" Arai from Dolby labs and rebranded, hence some JVCs' carrying both logos), has superb speed stability and is easily the most tolerant deck in any portable to older, tighter or more worn tapes. The Technics SAC05L is
very good, but can't cope with any tape that's less than perfect and has an appetite for clutches, surface mount tags on all of its many boards and is typically Technics in that everything you most often need to be working on is buried as deep as it's possible to bury it. It records well but it's an awkward wee badstart to mend.
Even the mechanically switched deck in JVC's entry level 656 has clearly had its development budget spent in the right places as they tend to be more reliable than anything of similar age and even the rough ones usually play at the right speed, sound good and again can manage worn tapes without sounding like they're at the bottom of the sea. I've had a couple of cheap examples from FridayAd recently and both played and recorded well before I'd so much as degaussed their heads, they're the boombox world's equivalent of the Volvo B18 engine!
So for recording since that's what this is about; JVCs tend to be best in each of the market sectors they represented with every one of theirs punching well above its weight. I believe that if you took the deck from any of the early '80s P Combos it would stand head and shoulders above the likes of the much-respected Aiwa ADF-410 and it would take a much more costly standalone deck to match the quality of recordings made on thae JVC products.
The only portable one I have heard or worked with that matches JVC recording quality is the deck in Hacker's RPC1 as also used in their music centres. But it darned well ought to have some quality to it as it was supplied by Nakamichi.
B&O are good but not as good as the marketroid borst implied and, if you don't need the slim styling or the quirky controls, the decks from their portables could also be found in Hitachi boomboxes of the period. Only the audio quality set the Danish maker's kit above the supplying company's equivalent products and then not by very much.
JVC for the win!
![Yes :yes: :yes:](/forum/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/boomboxery/yes.gif)