I Have One Too! Sanyo C9

Status
Not open for further replies.

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
May 5, 2009
6,796
7
38
54
'Bama!!! Deep In Da' Heart O' Dixie
Well Hardmen posted elsewhere his Sanyo C9 playing some bassy jazz. It got me to thinking, "I wonder how many people have a Sanyo C9?" So if you have one post it here. Also what do ya'll think of these? I know I hadn't seen anything on them posted before I got mine (during the old s2g days...) and still have it (about 8 years...).

I knew about the C9 from my days roaming the PX's on base in Europe. Mainly Robinson Barracks. Here is the famous "Pitbull". Currently playing "Lisa Zure - Sweet Fruit" as I type this. :-D :afro:

IMG_1562.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerome Tan

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
May 5, 2009
6,796
7
38
54
'Bama!!! Deep In Da' Heart O' Dixie
Hisrudeness said:
Drivers modded?
Yep. Polypropylene with dome tweeters. The originals were clearly not meant for heavy action. They are good, but these take the box from extremely good to great. :-D

If you aren't one to crank it super hard the originals will be fine if not as tight. :yes:
 

Reli

Member (SA)
Dec 24, 2010
6,319
443
83
USA
I had the C7.....I love how they're true component systems. Not like all the other guys who slapped the word "compo" on their crap even though the only parts that could separate were the speakers.
 

jimmyjimmy19702010

Member (SA)
May 5, 2012
3,578
26
38
Sunny Brisbane, Australia
Cool looking Sanyo - good move with the speaker upgrade as the standard speakers are very under engineered to run with that amp.

Compos are cool but I've wondered what the point of having separate components is apart from trying to make it look like a home HiFi setup.

James.... :-)
 

Reli

Member (SA)
Dec 24, 2010
6,319
443
83
USA
jimmyjimmy19702010 said:
Cool looking Sanyo - good move with the speaker upgrade as the standard speakers are very under engineered to run with that amp.

Compos are cool but I've wondered what the point of having separate components is apart from trying to make it look like a home HiFi setup.

James.... :-)
Better build quality, instead of cramming a bunch of boards together at hazardous angles.
And each component gets its own steel case, instead of cheap plastic.
Also, high-voltage stuff like amps should be kept away from low-voltage stuff like pre-amps.
 

oldskool69

Moderator
Staff member
May 5, 2009
6,796
7
38
54
'Bama!!! Deep In Da' Heart O' Dixie
Lasonic TRC-920 said:
Looks like something an executive would have in his office
Given what these cost, that's likely who had them. Which is one of the reasons I collect them. Think about this, and I'm going off of memory, new in the PX circa 1983/84 at Robinson Barracks (Stuttgart Germany) cost was about $400-450.00. The C4/C5 twins could be had for about $250 or so. The C7 was about $325-350. The C1 thru C3 was around $125-200.

That being said however, there were quite a few kids I knew that had these type of boomers and treated them like any ol' M70.

It took batteries like anything else and in my eyes, the component boomers were the pinnacle of design getting as close to true hi-fidelity stereo as you could in a portable product.

Truth be told, and this old nugget has been pounded into dirt, the first portable stereo was developed by Henry Kloss with the KLH Model 11 portable (though not powered by batteries) record player. What this meant was at least you could take it and your records to a friends house, or school, or party (as long as you had AC) thus the first (albeit clumsy by todays standards) means for youth of that era to share music and play it too was born.

Given that this was the medium of choice at the time (even reel to reel hadn't taken off yet except for commercial use) it made sense and packed two speakers which was separate when taken apart. Per Henry Kloss (an audio genius and legend) this was the proper way to listen to music. This in turn was the daddy to the Philips-Norelco "Carry-Corder" 150 cassette player which housed everything into a single unit, ran on five C cells, but was...monaural. In either case, neither had a radio function. Philips would by the late sixties eventually release a system which looked like a cube with a handle that had radio and cassette functions and ran on batteries...and played in stereo.

Thus, the first portable stereo music system was...a component system. :-D
 

Superduper

Member (SA)
Reli said:
My Siemens C7 AKA split apart:

Siemens RS806.jpg
I never could understand the reasoning behind why one would ever want to split them up sideways like that. It takes up much more real estate, can't sound any better, more space to collect dust, and can't be any easier to operate any of the controls. In fact, that's why home stereo equipment always end up getting stacked -- to save room.
 

Reli

Member (SA)
Dec 24, 2010
6,319
443
83
USA
Superduper said:
I never could understand the reasoning behind why one would ever want to split them up sideways like that. It takes up much more real estate, can't sound any better, more space to collect dust, and can't be any easier to operate any of the controls. In fact, that's why home stereo equipment always end up getting stacked -- to save room.
:lol: I just did it for Ebay. Come on though, you gotta admit it looks sweet. Here's another pic:

http://www.audiopower.ru/images/shop/items/l0z3kyhnbi6naoafrfaqr.jpg
 

im_alan_partridge

Member (SA)
Jul 21, 2010
2,976
1
38
London, England.
Nice Freddie and judging by the replys there isn't to many of these.

I used to have a C5 which looks similar but mine was a bit rough and only part functioning so I moved it on, it did sound quite nice on radio though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.