Panasonic RX-DT Series Specifications

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

woodz93

Member (SA)
Nov 9, 2011
29
1
0
Hawaii
Anyone has any specifications for these units? Not the service manual or operation manual, just tech specs, i.e. amplifier rms power, freq resp of cassettes, THD % values.... I'm guessing that the internals are the same for the spectrum of models with the differences being only in the speakers used?

Thanks
 
W

woodz93

Member (SA)
Nov 9, 2011
29
1
0
Hawaii
Fatdog said:
Sorry about that, woodz. I left off a directory.

http://www.boomboxery.com/downloads/Panasonic-DT-CT.rar
Click to expand...
@Fatdog - Thanks! I always wondered what the whole brochure looked like. Wonder no more :thumbsup:

@NZ Boom - was that all the technical specs published for the RX series? Man that cracks me up - I know the 690 had more oomph than the 680 but I love the usage of PMPO instead of the more realistic measure of RMS. Anyhow, doesn't detract from the fact that these are good boxes...
 
Fatdog

Fatdog

Well-Known Member
Staff member
May 3, 2009
10,900
127
63
woodz93 said:
...Anyhow, doesn't detract from the fact that these are good boxes...
Click to expand...
Very true. The RX-DT680 might not have the classic boombox appearance, but it is a great sounding powerhouse. :yes:
 
P

panabox1

Member (SA)
Mar 17, 2010
121
0
0
woodz93 said:
Fatdog said:
Sorry about that, woodz. I left off a directory.

http://www.boomboxery.com/downloads/Panasonic-DT-CT.rar
Click to expand...
@Fatdog - Thanks! I always wondered what the whole brochure looked like. Wonder no more :thumbsup:

@NZ Boom - was that all the technical specs published for the RX series? Man that cracks me up - I know the 690 had more oomph than the 680 but I love the usage of PMPO instead of the more realistic measure of RMS. Anyhow, doesn't detract from the fact that these are good boxes...
Click to expand...
Quite the other way around my friend. It was the 680 that had more oomph than the 690. Yeah the 690 was rated higher in wattage but it definitely got its butt kicked by the 680 espececially in terms of bass output. I was not impressed with the 690 at all.
 
W

woodz93

Member (SA)
Nov 9, 2011
29
1
0
Hawaii
panabox1 said:
woodz93 said:
Fatdog said:
Sorry about that, woodz. I left off a directory.

http://www.boomboxery.com/downloads/Panasonic-DT-CT.rar
Click to expand...
@Fatdog - Thanks! I always wondered what the whole brochure looked like. Wonder no more :thumbsup:

@NZ Boom - was that all the technical specs published for the RX series? Man that cracks me up - I know the 690 had more oomph than the 680 but I love the usage of PMPO instead of the more realistic measure of RMS. Anyhow, doesn't detract from the fact that these are good boxes...
Click to expand...
Quite the other way around my friend. It was the 680 that had more oomph than the 690. Yeah the 690 was rated higher in wattage but it definitely got its butt kicked by the 680 espececially in terms of bass output. I was not impressed with the 690 at all.
Click to expand...
I see... I love my 680 even more now :surf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom